Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Getting CLOSE to the Language of Eden

Getting CLOSE to  the Language of Eden 



Edenic letter color-groups: lip-made  (red); throat-made (brown), tooth-made (blue), nose-made  (green), tongue-made  (pink), whistling  letters (orange);      = reverse


New Entry Alert (will be in the 2018 E-Word of 1870 pages, ready by Dec.)




PROX(IMATE)    QaROABH     Koof-Resh-Bhet
Ka-ROVE                קרוב                   [BRV > PRV]
ROOTS:  The historical linguistics professionals in the etymology game are often quite good at recognizing  APPROXIMATE, similar-sounding words with related meanings. But only if it fits accepted theory, and will earn them dissertation approval, a PhD and academic tenure. The ultra-orthodox Darwinists of this field would require a million examples of full root reversals, a most unnatural phenomenon, before they would concede that there may have been a non-simian, non-human Creation of language and a Big Bang in global diversity of vocabulary.
They will get their million examples; Edenics has only begun.

PROXIMATE and PROXIMITY (near in space or time) is from Latin proximāre, to come near, and proximus, nearest. These  are a full reverse of guttural-liquid-bilabial   קרוב  QaROABH, near in space (I Kings 21:2), APPROXIMATE, relative (adjective or noun);  near in time (Isaiah 13:22);  קרב  QaRahBH,  to near, to approach (Exodus 14:20).
  
Nearing for battle, for armies engaging in combat is קרב  Q’RaBH  (battle – see our entries on the armored, cantankerous  “CRAB” and  the “CORVETTE” -- the French warship, not the sports car). There’s an echo of חרב  KHeReBH, sword, war.  Parting company, the distancing of warring parties,  the opposite of our QRB root, is  פרד PaRaiD -- which is why German “peace” is Frieden.

 There is קרב  QaRahBH nearing for intimacy with a woman (Genesis 20:4) or with the Lord (Exodus 16:9)… perhaps by offering a   קרבן QoRBahN (offering). Tokens/indicators  of spiritual intimacy are the  כרובים  KRooBHeeYM (cherubs) atop the Ark. (When G*d and an obedient Israel were on loving terms, the golden cherubs faced each other like lovers. The tone deaf and Torah-hating bible “scholars have even tried to compare Cherubs to griffins.)

 קרב  QeReBH is inward, and the body’s innards.  In  קרבנות QoRBahNOAT (offerings) we discard the intestines -- see GARBAGE words at entries “CRAP” and “CRAW” ( the inedible  stomach of fowl).  In Genesis 18:12 Sarah laughs  בקרבה  B’QiRBaH (within herself), while in Genesis 25:22 Rebecca’s children are struggling “within her”, in her womb… with the same word.
A drawing near, an approach, is a קרבה  Q’RahBHaH   (Isaiah 58:2).
בקרב הארץ  B’QeReBH Ha’AReTS means in the midst of he land (Genesis 45:6).

Because the Latin root, PRX,  came from a fully-reversed Edenic root, it is unsurprising that no Indo-European cognates were found to reconstruct a fake “root.”


BRANCHES: PROXIMA CENTAURI is the nearest star to Earth after the sun. PROXiMAl means nearest.  PROXIMO is archaic for “the next one.”  PROXY is more logically from our Edenic QRB root reversed than from Latin prōcūrāre (to take care of).
In Basque near” is  hurbil,  and PROXIMITY is hurbiltasun, an  S-G of קרוב   QaROABH, near.   This is close to  Semitic “nearby” words like āk’irabīya  in Amharic (Ethiopia),   قريب  qarib in Arabic, and Semitic-influenced languages like Swahili (karibu). Portuguese had a period of Arabic influence, but próximo (next, near, close, nearby, coming, forthcoming) is a full reverse of guttural-liquid-bilabial   קרוב  QaROABH, and so we are talking prehistoric, neuro-linguistics (Tower of Babel-babble), not the usual historical linguistics.
Korean has no R, so “proximity” sounds like geunjeob 근접.

AfterWORD: In 2016 academia was fully exposed as being run by twisted, far-Left anarchists and atheists who demand only conformity to their view, and a silencing of discourse. The reputation of our radically not-objective, non-scientific Soft Science professors is in the dumpster. In time, Edenics shall safely bury the trash of Semitically-challenged etymology.  www.edenics.org

Sunday, October 15, 2017

CREATION BY LANGUAGE



Genesis 1:5
And the Lord of Laws CALLED1 the light “Day, and the darkness [He] called ”Night.”
And there was evening, and there was morning, a first day.
---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---
Light and dark were in place in verse 4. Why would the Creator need to coin words for the light time ( יום YoaM)  and the night time (לילה  LaYLaH)?  In the opening phrase we already have a created heaven and earth.  So what is gained by naming heaven in verse 8, and naming Earth in verse 10 ?  

Creation by speech is a much-discussed topic. But the timing doesn’t seem chronologically right.

Coining words is a profound aspect of creating here, showing us that words are not mere signals to refer to things.  And yet, once light is introduced, to dispel the formless chaos, there seems to be a need for a new coinage for “day” and “night.”

Even more perplexing (the Torah, most non-humanly, always vexes us into thinking),  there DOES seem to be words for evening ( ערב EReV) and morning ( בקר BoQeR).   And the sun is not in place until verse 14, so how is there any day and night to name?

Similarly, the expanse or RACK of atmosphere and/or ever-expanding space ( רקיע  RaQeeY[A]h ) is made in verse 8, but has to be named ( שמים SHaMaYiM ) “sky.”  The dryness of a single continent is also already made, so what si gained by naming it “Earth” ( ארץ AReTS)   in verse ? And if there was one continent, Pangea, with a single ocean around it, would not the term  “seas”  ימים /YaMeeYM (also verse 10) be chronologically off?

Genesis and all of Torah runs on Theo-logic, not our linear chronologic.  Western bible critics are a fish out of water here. דבר  DaVaR means “thing” as well as “word.”  To exist, new Creations must have words in the Language of Creation coined by the Creator. And all the coinages here are for the object of all this Creation: Mankind.


The Creator is the source of light in a dark universe without form or molecules -- a world mortals can only begin to imagine in the age of cyberspace. A “day” for the Eternal is more like 1000 years human time (Psalms  90:4), with  EON (indeterminate long period of time) a better rendition for  יום  YOAM  (the Greek ne only shifting nose-made nasals M/N ). But, anticipating the coming of homo sapiens, and human Bible readers, the Eternal uses the evening and morning that we mortals can understand, both literally, and hopefully, as metaphors.

The questions above all point to an overarching answer.  This is not the usual human book recording the exploits of the writer, but a book by an unknowable writer with the human reader in mind.  All the sketchy details of the Creation account display great care for the humans who will sit at this elaborately set eco-table.

The opening “light” or radiation of the Big Bang here is not about humanity. Only humans require sunlight, a lesser  אור OWR, for ראיה R’EeYaH, seeing (note the reversal).
It is we mortals who must deal  with grey issues, with mixed light,  ( ערב EReV, evening) and the new clarity, examination time of  ( בקר BoQeR, morning). It is only we who cannot see the Heavenly that need the word  שמים SHaMaYiM, the realm on high). Only we who need traction to run or  RACE ( רץ RahTS), need a word for the dry parts of planet EARTH or ארץ  AReTS.

(All children of Adam will have that word for EARTH; after The Tower of Babel in chapter 11 some will reverse the AReTS/ EARTH word to TERRA.)

The namimg-creating issue does not end in Genesis 1. HaShem wants us to be co-creators who work on His garden. HaShem delights in this “image of G*d,” the gift of language given to Adam … to see what he will name the animals (Genesis 2:19).  See the Animal Names chapter in our eBook, A Garden of Edenics.

The high heavens are the Lord’s but the earth if for us (Psalms 115:16). The roots of Edenic Language are divine, but the words are ours.